<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>Klinik Öncesi Bilimler Bölümü</title>
<link href="https://acikerisim.bingol.edu.tr/handle/20.500.12898/1255" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle>Preclinical Sciences</subtitle>
<id>https://acikerisim.bingol.edu.tr/handle/20.500.12898/1255</id>
<updated>2026-04-07T12:03:30Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-04-07T12:03:30Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>Van Yöresinde Evde Beslenen Kafes Kuşlarında Bağırsak Parazitlerinin Yaygınlığının Araştırılması</title>
<link href="https://acikerisim.bingol.edu.tr/handle/20.500.12898/190" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Gül, Abdurrahman</name>
</author>
<id>https://acikerisim.bingol.edu.tr/handle/20.500.12898/190</id>
<updated>2021-03-29T14:25:44Z</updated>
<published>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Van Yöresinde Evde Beslenen Kafes Kuşlarında Bağırsak Parazitlerinin Yaygınlığının Araştırılması
Gül, Abdurrahman
Bu araştırma, Van yöresinde evde beslenen kafes kuşlarında bulunan parazitlerin yaygınlığını araştırmak için yapılmıştır. Bunun&#13;
için, 70 kafes kuşundan (6 papağan, 5 bülbül, 24 kanarya, 35 muhabbet kuşu) dışkı örnekleri alınıştır. Parazitoloji laboratuarında, 70&#13;
dışkı örneği, Helmint yumurtaları, Eimeria sp. ookistleri ve Giardia sp. kistleri yönünden nativ ve sedimentasyon, Cryptosporidium sp.&#13;
ookistleri yönünden de asid-fast boyama yöntemleri ile incelenmiştir. Gaitaları incelenen 70 kafes kuşunun 6 (%8,57)’sı enfekte bulunmuştur.&#13;
Eimeria sp. ookistleri, muhabbet kuşlarında (%8,57) ve kanaryada (%8,33) tespit edilirken, Cryptosporidium sp. ookistleri ise&#13;
sadece papağanlarda (%16,67) tespit edilmiştir. Kafes kuşlarının hiç birinde Helmint sp. yumurtası ve Giardia sp. kisti bulunamamıştır.&#13;
Bülbüllerde de hiçbir parazit tespit edilememiştir.
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>The first isolation of campylobacter lanienae from chickens</title>
<link href="https://acikerisim.bingol.edu.tr/handle/20.500.12898/171" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Açık, Mehmet Nuri</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Karahan, Murat</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Öngör, Hasan</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Karagülle, Burcu</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Çetinkaya, Burhan</name>
</author>
<id>https://acikerisim.bingol.edu.tr/handle/20.500.12898/171</id>
<updated>2021-03-29T14:25:09Z</updated>
<published>2013-06-06T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">The first isolation of campylobacter lanienae from chickens
Açık, Mehmet Nuri; Karahan, Murat; Öngör, Hasan; Karagülle, Burcu; Çetinkaya, Burhan
The aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence of&#13;
Campylobacter jejuni, C. coli, C. lari and C. lanienae which are the most&#13;
common causes of acute bacterial gastroenteritis in humans, in clinically&#13;
healthy cattle, sheep and chickens. A total number of 2700 abattoir samples&#13;
containing 150 intestinal contents and 150 gall bladders from each of&#13;
the animal species in each of the three provinces located in the east of&#13;
Turkey. Following the inoculation of the samples onto modified Charcoal&#13;
Cefoperazone Deoxycholate Agar (mCCDA), Campylobacter spp. was&#13;
isolated from 24.7% (667/2700). In the analysis of the isolates with speciesspecific&#13;
Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), the identification percentages&#13;
of Campylobacter species were determined as 78.1% for C. jejuni, 23.7% for&#13;
C. coli, 1.2% for C. lanienae and 1.0% for C. lari. To the authors’ knowledge,&#13;
this study reports the isolation of C. lanienae in animals for the first time in&#13;
Turkey and in chickens species for the first time in the world.
</summary>
<dc:date>2013-06-06T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Investigation of arcobacters in meat and faecal samples of clinically healthy cattle in Turkey</title>
<link href="https://acikerisim.bingol.edu.tr/handle/20.500.12898/170" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Öngör, Hasan</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Çetinkaya, Burhan</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Açık, Burhan</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Atabay, Halil İbrahim</name>
</author>
<id>https://acikerisim.bingol.edu.tr/handle/20.500.12898/170</id>
<updated>2021-03-29T14:25:01Z</updated>
<published>2004-03-08T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Investigation of arcobacters in meat and faecal samples of clinically healthy cattle in Turkey
Öngör, Hasan; Çetinkaya, Burhan; Açık, Burhan; Atabay, Halil İbrahim
Aims: To investigate the presence of Arcobacter spp. in minced beef meat (n ¼ 97) and rectal faecal samples&#13;
(n ¼ 200) collected from cattle immediately after slaughter at a local abattoir in Turkey.&#13;
Methods and Results: Meat samples were examined using three different isolation procedures (CATsupplemented&#13;
media, de Boer arcobacter isolation method and membrane filtration method), but only one method&#13;
(CAT-supplemented media) was employed for faecal samples. The isolated Arcobacter strains were identified&#13;
by genus- and species-(multiplex) specific PCR assays. Arcobacter spp. were isolated from 5 and 9Æ5% of meat and&#13;
faecal samples respectively. Although the only Arcobacter sp. found in meat samples was Arcobacter butzleri,&#13;
all three pathogenic species – A. butzleri, A. cryaerophilus and A. skirrowii – were detected in the rectal swabs. No&#13;
Arcobacter was isolated when the de Boer method was used for minced meat samples but the same five meat&#13;
samples were found positive for arcobacters when CAT-supplemented media and membrane filtration method&#13;
were used.&#13;
Conclusions: The membrane filtration method was found to be superior to the CAT-supplemented media,&#13;
because it led to a reduction in competing microflora. However, the necessity for one filter and medium for each&#13;
sample makes this method somewhat expensive. The multiplex-PCR (m-PCR) assay shortened significantly the&#13;
time required for the identification of Arcobacter spp. and also removed the possibility of false positive results due to&#13;
other campylobacteria.&#13;
Significance and Impact of the Study: This study reports the isolation of Arcobacter spp. in cattle for the first&#13;
time in Turkey. The m-PCR assay enables the identification and differentiation of all arcobacters simultaneously in&#13;
one-step PCR.
</summary>
<dc:date>2004-03-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>TraT and CNF2 genes of escherichia coli isolated from milk of healthy cows and sheep</title>
<link href="https://acikerisim.bingol.edu.tr/handle/20.500.12898/169" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Açık, Mehmet Nuri</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Yurdakul, Erhan</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Çakıcı, Leyla</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Onat, Nazif</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Doğan, Özlem</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Çetinkaya, Burhan</name>
</author>
<id>https://acikerisim.bingol.edu.tr/handle/20.500.12898/169</id>
<updated>2021-03-29T14:24:48Z</updated>
<published>2004-07-04T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">TraT and CNF2 genes of escherichia coli isolated from milk of healthy cows and sheep
Açık, Mehmet Nuri; Yurdakul, Erhan; Çakıcı, Leyla; Onat, Nazif; Doğan, Özlem; Çetinkaya, Burhan
The objectives of the present study were to isolate Escherichia coli from milk of apparently healthy cows and sheep and to investigate&#13;
the presence of traT and cytotoxic necrotising factor-2 (CNF2) virulence genes by multiplex polymerase chain reaction&#13;
(PCR). Milk samples collected from a total of 1028 apparently healthy ruminants (737 cows and 291 sheep) in eastern Turkey were&#13;
streaked onto 5% sheep-blood agar. E. coli was isolated and identified by biochemical tests in 5.9% (61/1028) of milk samples.&#13;
Correct amplification with the molecular length of 232 bp was obtained from all E. coli isolates by the species-specific PCR. The&#13;
isolation rates of the agent were calculated to be 7.6% (56/737) in cows and 1.7% (5/291) in sheep. The difference between these&#13;
proportions was statistically significant (p&lt;0.001). Multiplex PCR showed that traT and CNF2 genes were present in 62.3% and&#13;
6.6% of all isolates, respectively. Both genes were present in 16.4% of the isolates, with only 14.7% having neither gene.
</summary>
<dc:date>2004-07-04T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
